Current Research Abstract
In my current research during
my Masters degree, I am trying to study the three-level atom Microlaser using
the Quantum Trajectory Method (QTM). The Microlaser is an important tool used
to explore the fundamental interaction between a few number of atoms and
photons. It consists mainly of a high quality optical cavity through which a
beam of excited atoms passes. The
Microlaser has been used since 1994 successfully for studies both theoretical
and experimental of the quantum interaction between two level atoms and one
privileged mode of the radiation field and helped to investigate the
fundamental questions in cavity QED in addition to testing new ideas in quantum
information.
As any quantum system
interacting with a reservoir consisting of many degrees of freedom, the time
evolution of the Microlaser is described by a master equation which in general
has no simple analytical solution for realistic systems or requires intensive
computational power for solving it.
The quantum trajectory method is a Monte Carlo Method applied to a quantum system. A single
trajectory of the Microlaser is the one corresponding to a certain evolution of
the atom-field state as the atoms pass through the Microlaser cavity subjected
to a series of quantum jumps corresponding to all possible events that can
occur during and after the interaction between the atom and the field inside
the cavity. All photons emitted from the atom or the cavity
are supposed to be detected immediately by perfect detectors. The
physical properties of the system are obtained by averaging over a large number
of trajectories. I am trying to study
the photon statistics of the Microlaser at steady state and study the effect of
the velocity distribution width of the atoms passing through the microlaser cavity on the field at steady state. I have been
using two kinds of trajectories in my simulations; one simulating the field
state as a single number state that evolve between quantum jumps by changing
the number of photons by a maximum of one photon in each jump and the other
method simulates the field wavefunction as a superposition of many number
states. It would be interesting to compare the field statistical properties (i.e the intensity correlation function) resulting from each
unravelling and see which scheme is closer to reality
by comparing both of them with the solution obtained by solving the master
equation by other numerical methods (e.g fourth order
Runge Kutta method).
Another interesting point to investigate in this research would be to use
quantum trajectories to examine the behavior of the Microlaser in situations
where the photon distribution at steady state is double-peaked and study the
occurrence of spontaneous quantum jumps in the rate of atoms exiting the cavity
in the ground state or the excited state corresponding to jumps between the two
peaks (for the case of two level atoms.) The dynamical evolution of the field
inside the cavity from the vacuum state until it reaches the steady state can
also be investigated using the quantum trajectory method.
References:
1.
Microlaser: A
laser with One Atom in an Optical Resonator, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 1785-1788 (1994)
2.
Laser
spectroscopy and quantum optics Rev. Mod. Phys, Vol. 71, Issue 2, March 1999
Home